would the allies have won ww2 without america

Historically 21st Army Group had the English Channel/North Sea on one flank and the Americans on the other flank. This prompted Germany to declare war on the United States, which, in turn, led to the United States to declare war on Germany on December 11, 1941. Also the liberty ships were built mainly for the US government and weren't in full production until late 42 (after the u-boats had been beaten by bletchly park). They did not have the important critical resources, minerals needed for war production, hampering their already technologically backward equipment. But right before the Normandy landings, this region (France, Atlantic Wall) was still considered a holiday region by German army, and sons, relatives of notables, party figures were sent there rather than Eastern Front as one old BBC documentary so bluntly put it. By the time lead-lease had produced any major change in the situation the decision to invade Russia and thus lose the war had already been taken in Berlin. Politics latest updates: Half of Britons think Tories will lose seats Thus, landings in 1944 came at a point at which Soviets broke German armies and were racing towards Berlin. We all know how the war turned outwith an overwhelming Soviet-Western Allied victory over Nazi Germany ending with the destruction of Germany and the death by starvation of millions of its citizens. That proved to be fairly well matched against Russia, France, and Great Britain at least in the early stages of the war. And not surprisingly, not only the few German forces which took over Italys defense from Italian armies defended all of Italy easily and a lot of lives were lost in hilly Italian countryside, but also even at the end of the war the forces in Italy were not able to move out of soft underbelly of Axis towards French hinterland, leave aside Germany. And the Russian winter. I assume that since Overlord hasn't happened that most or at least many of the German troops garrisoning France are available to be redeployed to Munich, Budapest, or anywhere else the Germans care to send them. What were strength estimates of German forces in Budapest and Munich? The impact of the United States joining the war was significant. However it doesnt seem to be critical to the wars result. The United States is a country of machines. And the US's wartime economy still had room to spool up even more. In addition, the Lend-Lease program propped up the Soviet railway system, which played a fundamental role in moving and supplying troops. WebIn 1941-2 we started to lose shipping to U boats faster than we could build them so we would eventually have brought to starvation without the US Liberty ships. Keeping America out of the war should have been the goal for Germany. What would NOT have happened would have been an invasion of the UK. He believed that a war with Russia would lead to the downfall of both empires.. Faced with these realities and incensed by the attack on Pearl Harbor, everyday Americans enthusiastically supported the war effort. Therefore when we look at the presence of US forces in Western Front, we see them delayed by Churchill to almost until the end of the war, and wasted in much bloody, irrelevant and peripheral battles in Italy. WebThe war in Europe was not just won with Soviet blood. The loss of the Ukraine and other occupied areas. won World War II In addition, almost half of all the rails used by the Soviet Union during the war came through Lend-Lease. During the Spanish Civil War, which has been called a dress rehearsal for the Second World War, Germany's Luftwaffe perfected its strategy of using dive bombers and close-support attack aircraft. In 1941-2 we started to lose shipping to U boats faster than we could build them so we would eventually have brought to starvation without the US Liberty ships. Churchills delaying tactics took the form of pressing for a continued push to divert troops to capture the Dodecanese islands in the Mediterranean and mount diversionary battles in Italy. "It was not just some piece of scrap metal. "If the United States had not helped us, we would not have won the war," he wrote in his memoirs. Red Army tank officers were not impressed with the 2-pounder (40mm) gun on the Matilda and Valentines, nor their poor cross-country mobility, but their 6075mm-thick armour was impervious to German 3.7cm and 5cm anti-tank weapons. Overall, the Western Allies were responsible only for a small fraction of the losses sustained by German infantry and armor between 1941 and 1943 (around 10 percent); however, their contribution in the destruction and occupation of the Luftwaffe was overwhelming. W. Without the need to fight in the Atlantic; to transport large amounts of troops, equipment, and supplies across the entire continent; and the necessity to defend against Allied bombing, Germany could have massively reduced its U-boat, locomotive, and anti-aircraft gun and ammunition production and converted at least part of these capacities into the production of more aircraft and equipment for land warfare. The entry of the United States was the turning point of the war, because it made the eventual defeat of Germany possible. Most famously, Soviet dictator Josef Stalin raised a toast to the Lend-Lease program at the November 1943 Tehran conference with British Prime Minister Winston Churchill and U.S. President Franklin Roosevelt. Japan had attacked the United States, so Germany was never required to join with its Axis partner. Roosevelt had caved in to Churchills delaying tactics on the invasion before, and now all concerned, from Hopkins to Marshall to Leahy, were worried it might happen again. However, even with lack of US presence in the war, Germany would still need to keep some presence in this Atlantic Wall of theirs. So, until 1944 summer, Soviets were practically alone in Europe. America supplied Stalin with 400,000 trucks, 2,000 locomotives, more than 10,000 rail From the depths of the Cold War to the present day, many Soviet and Russian politicians have ignored or downplayed the impact of American assistance to the Soviets, as well as the impact of the entire U.S.-British war against the Nazis. These freed up Soviet resources to concentrate on combat vehicle production. It may not display this or other websites correctly. Franz Ferdinand was the strongest spokesman for peace in Austria-Hungary. Given the way the events of the war played out, there was no other foreseeable outcome other than her defeat. Much of the American fuel was added to lower-grade Soviet fuel to produce the high-octane fuel needed by modern military aircraft. Defeat never came down to one battle or one campaign. War of 1812. without Most Russians believe the Soviet military would have been able to win World War II without the efforts of the U.S. or its allies, a "Without Lend-Lease, the Red Army would not have had about one-third of its ammunition, half of its aircraft, or half of its tanks. The Soviet failure to invest in developing armoured personnel carriers for their infantry, better reconnaissance vehicles and mobile flak guns were serious technical mistakes that proved costly in battle, but Lend-Lease deliveries of US-made halftracks and reconnaissance vehicles helped to partly rectify this deficiency by the last year of the war. 80% less T-34s due to the aluminium diesel tank engine problem would have been a catastrophe for the Soviet war effort. The Terror? Churchill is particularly a factor in this. It was quite well equipped with 9,248 tanks, 6,584 artillery pieces and. 4, issues 17-20), Captain America awakens from suspended animation in 1964 to find thatdue to a We have seen a hundred times, especially in American cinema, references to how the help of the USA was indispensable for the allied victory in Europe. How many U.S. troops lost their lives in ww1? The Joint Chiefs of Staff anticipated trouble with Churchill. If in a worse scenario the Soviets would have lost Leningrad or the Kavkaz oil fields, or maybe even Moscow, they would just move their government, army, factories and supplies to Siberia. WebTo give an idea: IIRC, just before Japan's defeat, in one year the United States pumped out as much material as Japan did over the course of the war. What would have happened if the United States didnt enter WWII? "I knew that its place was in a museum," Vyacheslav Filippov, a colonel in the Russian Air Force reserve who has written extensively about the Lend-Lease program's Siberian connection, told RFE/RL at the time. Would the Allies have won ww2 without Hitler could have accepted Britains generous offer and scheduled the conference for late 1938 or early 1939 rather than foolishly violating the Munich Pact in March 1939. But as most historians are aware, German defeat in the war would have been far from inevitable had Nazi leader Adolf Hitler refrained from making certain critical mistakes. On May 11, 1947, 27 people were rescued, having spent nearly three weeks in the icebound wreck. On April 23, 1947, it was forced to make an emergency landing with 36 people on board near the village of Volochanka on the Taimyr Peninsula. Italy was a reliable partner but its army was neither prepared nor even eager for war. On the map below, the line I've drawn from Central Austria, up around Prague, down towards Budapest, and back to Trieste is about 700 miles. Even if Japan wisely realized this (and it seems they did, in Khalkin Gol) and refrained from pushing towards USSR, Soviets would still keep divisions across the border even if themselves did not advance that would force Japan to keep defenses and divisions here, reducing their war effort elsewhere. But things suddenly take a weird turn after North Africa: Landings in Western Europe keep getting delayed despite all pressures from Soviets. But During 1942, the Red Army lost over 15,000 tanks, including 1,200 KV-1, 6,600 T-34s and 7,200 T-60/70s.100 About half of the 10,500 Lend-Lease tanks (3,000 British, 7,500 USA) delivered in 1942 were also lost.101 Soviet industry built 24,231 tanks in 1942, including 12,535 T-34s and 2,426 KV-1s. 3 US as the major part of landings in Northern Africa, Italy and Europeis an important bit. [Total: 0 Average: 0] Without the backing of American weaponry, munitions and loans, the Allies would have been forced to abandon their goal of the knockout blow. Unless you can refute the other scenarios for Allied victory before 1941 then the answer to the OPs question remains yes. Our tank production was lower than Germany's and the quality was appalling. Kennedy says that most historians agree that American entry into World War I tipped the scales against Germany and that without the participation of the United States the Allies would have lost, defined as having to make a compromise peace with the Germans largely on German terms. Things werent going well for the. At the same time, Italian dictator Benito Mussolini could have made demands for France and Britain to honor their promises to Italy for more Yugoslav territory in return for entering World War One on the side of the Allies. Normandy and the Bocage around it could be considered bloody battles, with Allies moving inch by inch. Siberia, is not even an option to consider. Roosevelt also contributed to Soviet stabilization. 2 US taking on Japan and preventing them from attacking anyone else. Malyshev encouraged the use of stamped parts and a cast turret in order to cut corners, accepting a certain temporary reduction in quality in return for much greater output of tanks. A Japanese attack on the Soviet Union, on the other hand, would have put Josef Stalin in the very difficult situation of also fighting a two-front war. Thats assuming they were able to make advances. Plausibility check: could a better handled Italy have become France's partner in enforcing the Versailles treaty? By D-Day, Germany had only 600 fighters left, essentially nothing. Did the Allies win ww1 because of the US? This caused him to do an about-face and guarantee Poland against potential German military aggression, which Hitler had never even contemplated up to that point. have By June 1944, Soviets were already positioning for their drive into Germany, as can be seen from the state of Eastern Front at that date: Just a month after Normandy, Red Army was already pushing into Germany. The notion that Britain could have survived long term with the US's aid is total rubbish. The outcome could have been quite different. BBC - History - World Wars: World War Two: How the Allies Won However non-combat aid like trucks, radios are an important factor. Not enough men. They are related because both buildups on both sides of the cold war started during WW2 to fight the Axis powers. Additionally, without bombing, and the need to maintain a large enough army to fight on several fronts, there would have been less need to use forced labor in the factories, thus boosting production. Perhaps my original question should have been "What would have happened in WWII if there had been no Spam?". The problem is the flanks. Had Hitler not violated the Munich Pact and instead used a Four Power Conference to settle his claims to the Polish Corridor with Poland, then he might have been remembered as the most successful German Chancellor in German history (with the exception of Otto von Bismarck) for accomplishing the never-before realized dream of a united Germany. It is a little known fact that Hitler passed up a huge opportunity to satisfy his few remaining territorial demands after the signing of the Munich Pact for the return of the free German city of Danzig and/or the Polish Corridor along with some former German colonies in Africa and the Pacific without the need for war between Germany and Poland, let alone between Germany and the United Kingdom and France. The Allies alone could not possibly have defeated Germany. By More than 20,000 Katyusha mobile multiple-rocket launchers were mounted on the chassis of American Studebaker trucks. My object was to cheer up Harry and give him my ideas as to how he was to hold the president in line if he couldI have no doubt of the British people doing it. This, of course, was the ultimate objective of Chamberlains accommodationist policy of Nazi Germany all along. Britain still would have prevailed. WebBy the time the allies were pushing through Europe, the US had collected many victories in the pacific, the arena of carriers and planes. Fact: Adolf Hitler Could Have Won World War II Had the German invasion of Russia occurred in other climatic conditions, and with the Japanese army attacking in the eastern region, perhaps the result would have been different. However, the overall 71 exchange ratio between Soviet and German tank losses was inconsistent with the Red Army gaining any kind of superiority over the Wehrmachts panzer forces. 'We Would Have Lost': Did U.S. Lend-Lease Aid Tip The Balance Japanese staff knew this, hence the plan for war against US was a quick strike which would cripple a decent amount of US Navy and therefore hopefully force a quick, favorable peace. WebFormer president Donald Trump, who is facing court action in the US, is set to arrive in Scotland later today. Lend-Lease trucks and jeeps put the Russian Army on wheels for the first time ever while US food (including, famously, spam)kept the Russian population going. Of course, we are not taking tactical considerations into account. Germany invaded France with more horses than Napoleon had used in 1812! The Poles would likely have accepted their peace offer after the Soviets invaded Poland on September 17 in order to defend Poland from the all-out Soviet invasion and planned Soviet annexation of nearly two-thirds of Polish territory under the original Hitler-Stalin Pact. Neither the Allied Powers (France, Britain, Russia, Italy, Japan, and several smaller states) nor the Central Powers (Germany, Austria-Hungary, the Ottoman Empire, and Bulgaria) would have gained everything they wanted from a negotiated settlement. Yes Lend-Lease was vital, In order to ensure that tank production goals were met by Soviet industry, Stalin made Vyacheslav Malyshev, an engineer who had proven himself in the expansion of Soviet heavy industry in the 1930s, head of the Peoples Commissariat of the Tank Industry of the USSR (NKTP) that was established on 11 September. Inevitably so, since British were still in the war, and even though British and Canadians were frustrated in a grand fashion when they attempted a landing inDieppe Raidto test German defenses in regard to a possible landing, the risk of a potential landing was still there. A Soviet report by Politburo member Nikolai Voznesensky in 1948 asserted that the United States, described as "the head of the antidemocratic camp and the warrior of imperialist expansion around the world," contributed materiel during the war that amounted to just 4.8 percent of the Soviet Union's own wartime production. But we have much to learn from that achievement as we face our troubles today. It is no exaggeration to say that America won the war abroad and the peace at home at the same time. Though after landing and adapting to Western Front warfare after a while US forces were the backbone of the effort in Western Front, by the time they started making advance into Germany the war was more or less considered over by many on both sides. The Allies likely would have followed suit by making peace with Nazi Germany, too, thus ending World War II after a mere two weeks of fighting.

Fallout 76 Investigate The Signal And Eliminate Potential Threats, Articles W