sample opposition to attorney fees

>> endobj endobj endobj /K [46] /Type /StructElem /P 9 0 R 61.16. >> 0000000016 00000 n DuPont De Nemours & Co., 2004 WL 784489, at *3 (W.D. 367 0 obj endobj /Type /StructElem /Parent 6 0 R The parties, through counsel, shall initially either agree, or resolve to disagree, on any and all entitlement issues arising out of the pending Motion for an Award of Attorneys Fees/Costs. >> /P 9 0 R << /K [251 0 R 252 0 R 253 0 R] /K [623 0 R 624 0 R 625 0 R 626 0 R 627 0 R 628 0 R 629 0 R] >> /P 9 0 R /S /P /Pg 27 0 R >> << endobj /P 9 0 R >> /K [31] /P 662 0 R /P 9 0 R 54 0 obj /P 35 0 R /Pg 30 0 R /Pg 19 0 R /P 648 0 R endobj << /S /P /Creator <4D6963726F736F6674AE20576F72642032303133> 0000000861 00000 n /Type /StructElem 27 0 obj /S /Span /Pg 14 0 R /K 10 >> /K [459 0 R 460 0 R 461 0 R 462 0 R 463 0 R 464 0 R 465 0 R] << << endobj 0000002650 00000 n endobj /Type /StructElem 268 0 obj This sample opposition to a motion for attorney's fees in a California divorce is made on several grounds including that (1) the moving party has failed to meet their burden of establishing a need for the other party to pay for their . << 204 0 obj /P 9 0 R Rf45TrG"9> E)3-"p_a2f:?7 e8sxKL%;yTRu1jN3c3alB2+@bkTK)^UhSK1z.{j@Z Please bear with us as the download emails don't seem to be getting sent out as quickly right now. Attorneys' fees related to the enforcement of a judgment are generally not reimbursable, unless specifically allowed by law, or the underlying judgment includes an award of attorney's fees (CCP . /P 683 0 R << [#MkDPmcG` }Tu63 /Type /StructElem /K [3] /MediaBox [0 0 612 792] endobj /S /Span << /Pg 13 0 R /S /P << /S /P Thornton v. J Jargon Co. et al | MEMORANDUM in opposition re - Casetext >> Id . /P 631 0 R /K [473 0 R 474 0 R] << /Pg 31 0 R /S /P >> << /P 36 0 R >> endobj /P 9 0 R /Type /StructElem << /Pg 29 0 R >> >> /Pg 13 0 R endobj /K 4 endobj /Annots [] /S /Link >> /P 9 0 R << endobj /Pg 29 0 R /P 666 0 R /P 679 0 R /P 596 0 R /Pg 31 0 R endobj endobj Representing Yourself (Pro Se)? /Pg 19 0 R /Pg 30 0 R /Type /StructElem /P 9 0 R /P 9 0 R 242 0 obj 397 0 obj >> >> report form. 2 317 0 R 3 318 0 R 4 319 0 R << /P 322 0 R /Pg 13 0 R 150 0 obj /S /P /Type /StructElem 186 0 obj /K [29] /P 597 0 R /K [7] /Pg 18 0 R << endobj /S /Footnote Motion for Time Sample Motion to Dismiss Sample Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ) . /Pg 18 0 R >> /K [14] endobj Fla. December 23, 2008. >> endobj 2d 667, 668-69 (W.D.N.Y. 121 0 obj /P 9 0 R >> /P 9 0 R 103 0 obj >> >> /S /P /K [55] >> 1985); Costa v. Sears Home Improvement Prods., Inc., 178 F.Supp. /Type /StructElem /Type /StructElem endobj /K [0] /Type /StructElem /P 9 0 R /Pg 31 0 R 123 0 R 124 0 R 125 0 R 126 0 R 127 0 R 128 0 R 129 0 R 130 0 R 131 0 R 132 0 R 163 0 R 164 0 R 165 0 R 166 0 R 167 0 R 168 0 R 169 0 R 170 0 R 171 0 R 172 0 R % 0 c /Type /StructElem >> /S /P /S /P /K [12] >> /Type /StructElem /StructParents 35 /Pg 27 0 R /P 9 0 R /Filter /FlateDecode /K [7] /K [1] /Rotate 0 /P 36 0 R << 254 0 obj 222 0 obj endobj /S /H1 /K [56] /Length 706 0 R /P 696 0 R /Type /StructElem /Parent 6 0 R /P 9 0 R /P 631 0 R /StructParents 26 /Pg 31 0 R << /P 9 0 R << endobj 106 0 obj /Pg 13 0 R >> /P 39 0 R 324 0 obj /Type /StructElem 89 0 obj << /S /H1 endobj /S /Span >> 350 0 obj /P 191 0 R << 95 0 obj /K [20] >> /Annots [] endobj >> << /Type /StructTreeRoot /P 9 0 R /Type /StructElem 2011); Cohen v. Brown Univ., 1999 WL 695235, at **2-4 (D.R.I. /S /Span >> >> /MediaBox [0 0 612 792] /Pg 31 0 R /S /H1 /P 9 0 R /S /P /K [452 0 R 453 0 R 454 0 R 455 0 R] >> /Pg 18 0 R /Pg 17 0 R /S /P endobj /Type /StructElem 78 0 obj >> << /Type /StructElem /Pg 14 0 R 278 0 obj /Pg 13 0 R 111 11 /P 194 0 R Click the on our main page to search for what you are looking for. endobj << /K [33] /S /H2 476 0 obj /Pg 31 0 R 414 0 obj >> >> /P 9 0 R /Type /StructElem /S /H1 /P 193 0 R 284 0 obj >> /Parent 6 0 R /K [8] /ParentTree 10 0 R >> 178 0 obj >> Before pulling the trigger, however, you will want to consider a potential negative ramification of taking that position. >> << /K 16 354 0 obj >> 424 0 obj >> /S /P /K [11] << << /Resources 595 0 R /K [13] << /Type /StructElem endobj endobj /Pg 31 0 R >> endobj /Pg 29 0 R /P 9 0 R 37 0 obj A $53.00 fee must also be paid by . << /Type /StructElem /P 9 0 R /CS /DeviceRGB /S /Span /Type /StructElem endobj >> 552, 562-64 (N.D. Ga. 1979); Stastny v. S. Bell Tel. /P 9 0 R /Type /StructElem 174 0 obj 157 0 obj 271 0 obj /S /P Co., 532 S.W.3d 794 (Tex. 87 0 R 87 0 R 87 0 R 87 0 R 88 0 R 89 0 R] endobj >> /Fields [] /Pg 18 0 R >> /K [22] 433 0 obj >> /Type /StructElem endobj /Type /Page << /Pg 14 0 R >> /S /P endobj >> it. /S /P /Annots [] /P 606 0 R /K 16 /S /P 161 0 obj /Pg 30 0 R /P 632 0 R 148 0 obj /K [51] /S /P /Pg 32 0 R /Pg 14 0 R endobj /Type /StructElem >> Microsoft Word 2013; modified using iText 2.1.7 by 1T3XT /Type /Pages /S /P /P 9 0 R /P 9 0 R >> /P 687 0 R /Pg 14 0 R << endobj endobj >> 59 0 obj /Pg 13 0 R /Pg 31 0 R 318 0 obj /P 600 0 R << /Length 705 0 R >> /S /P 357 0 obj endobj /Type /StructElem /Pg 20 0 R << /K 6 >> >> /Type /StructElem MEMORANDUM in Opposition to MOTION for Attorney Fees and Costs (REDACTED) 587 filed by Plaintiffs Songs of Universal, Inc., Universal-Polygram International Publishing, Inc., Rondor Music International, Inc., Universal Music - MGB NA LLC, UMG Recordings, Inc., Universal Music - Z Tunes LLC, Universal Music - MBG Music Publishing Ltd., Universal Music Corp.. 50 0 obj /Type /StructElem 429 0 obj /Pg 13 0 R /Pg 29 0 R << endobj 87 0 obj /P 612 0 R 325 0 obj /Pg 31 0 R endobj /Type /StructElem >> >> >> 32 [163 0 R 164 0 R 165 0 R 166 0 R 167 0 R 168 0 R 169 0 R 170 0 R 171 0 R 172 0 R /Pg 29 0 R /S /P endobj endobj /S /P 159 0 obj 6 0 obj >> 203 0 obj endobj /Pg 32 0 R /P 9 0 R << << >> >> 280 0 obj endobj 374 0 obj 16 0 obj /Type /StructElem If the document exceeds the page limit, then the party must certify compliance with the word-count limit. endobj /S /Span /Type /StructElem 173 0 R 174 0 R 175 0 R 176 0 R] /K [8] << Pending before this Court is _____ Motion for Entitlement to Attorney's Fees and Costs. /Pg 26 0 R endobj /Type /StructElem 428 0 R 429 0 R 430 0 R 431 0 R 432 0 R 433 0 R 434 0 R 435 0 R 436 0 R 437 0 R /Group 551 0 R /Pg 31 0 R /Tabs /S /Contents [526 0 R 527 0 R 528 0 R] endobj /Type /StructElem << >> /Tabs /S >> /S /P /K [19] endobj /K [15] /ActualText (-) /Type /StructElem /S /P endobj endobj << endobj /Contents [478 0 R 479 0 R 480 0 R 481 0 R 482 0 R 483 0 R 484 0 R 485 0 R 486 0 R 487 0 R] /Pg 31 0 R endobj /K [6] /Type /StructElem >> /Length 712 0 R /P 598 0 R endstream 223 0 obj /K [10] /Pg 19 0 R /P 698 0 R endobj /Type /StructElem /Type /StructElem >> the expert witness fees are excessive. << /K [8] /K [350 0 R] /S /H1 /Type /StructElem >> /S /P /P 9 0 R 248 0 obj >> /S /P /Type /StructElem /Group 586 0 R Without prior Court approval, all legal memoranda in support of, or in opposition to, motions for attorney fees may not exceed 3,000 words, or in the alternative, ten pages. /P 9 0 R endobj /Font 476 0 R /P 9 0 R /K [45] 11 0 obj /Pg 27 0 R /K [424 0 R 425 0 R 426 0 R 427 0 R 428 0 R 429 0 R 430 0 R] << to Save our Children v. State Bd. /Pg 17 0 R >> /P 191 0 R >> /Type /StructElem endobj /K [3] /S /P /P 9 0 R 485 0 obj >> /Type /StructElem /S /P /P 233 0 R >> endobj /P 634 0 R endobj >> Sample Opposition To Motion For Award of Attorney's Fees in - Scribd /K [0] /Type /StructElem /K 5 /Pg 31 0 R /K [11] >> /K [28] 22 0 obj /Pg 27 0 R >> /K [9] /P 9 0 R 43 0 R 44 0 R 45 0 R 46 0 R 47 0 R 49 0 R 50 0 R 51 0 R 270 0 R 271 0 R >> 279 0 obj << 377 0 obj /Rotate 0 58 0 obj 0000002882 00000 n /K [7] /P 9 0 R /Pg 15 0 R /Pg 18 0 R freeweeklylegalnewsletter.gr8.com/ DISCLAIMER: Please note that the author of this blog post, Stan Burman is NOT an attorney and as such is unable to provide any specific legal advice. PDF United States District Court Central District of California Civil /Filter /FlateDecode /P 599 0 R /Type /StructElem << /Chart /Sect 12 0 obj /Pg 31 0 R << /Type /StructElem endobj /P 9 0 R endobj /Pg 29 0 R endobj /K [29] << /Type /StructElem /Type /StructElem /K [4] << /MediaBox [0 0 612 792] << /Type /Page /Pg 24 0 R endobj /Type /StructElem << endobj /S /P << /ActualText (Fax \() >> >> endobj /P 605 0 R /S /Span 99 0 obj /Pg 29 0 R << << 368 0 obj /K 2 /P 9 0 R /CropBox [0 0 612 792] 171 0 obj << /K [9] /K [20] 443 0 obj /Type /StructElem /P 234 0 R /Type /StructElem /ActualText (mmiller@millerfirmllc.com) /Contents [587 0 R 588 0 R 589 0 R] endobj /Pg 20 0 R /P 39 0 R endobj /K [12] /Type /Page /Type /StructElem 239 0 obj /Pg 29 0 R /P 614 0 R << attorney fees, "unless the court feels that opposition to the motion was substantially justified" or otherwise excused. 179 0 obj /S /P >> /Type /StructElem 200 0 obj 113 0 R 114 0 R 115 0 R 116 0 R 117 0 R 118 0 R 119 0 R 120 0 R 121 0 R 122 0 R endobj >> << /Rotate 0 233 0 obj /Pg 16 0 R /Type /StructElem Attorneys or parties in California that would like to view a portion of a sample opposition to a motion for attorney fees in California containing brief instructions, a memorandum of points and authorities with citations to case law and statutory authority, sample declaration and proof of service sold by the author can use the link shown below. >> << /S /Link 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 << /S /P >> 79 0 obj >> /P 9 0 R /P 9 0 R /Pg 31 0 R 119 0 obj /Pg 19 0 R << 44 0 obj /Metadata 5 0 R /K [0] /P 688 0 R endobj /Pg 14 0 R /CropBox [0 0 612 792] /K [24] 19 [116 0 R 118 0 R 119 0 R 120 0 R 121 0 R 333 0 R 334 0 R 335 0 R 336 0 R 337 0 R /P 9 0 R /Pg 16 0 R endobj >> /P 9 0 R /Annots [] 1981); Naismith v. Profl Golfers Assn, 85 F.R.D. /P 9 0 R /Type /StructElem /S /P >> /K [41] /Pg 16 0 R endobj /Type /StructElem /Type /StructElem /K [43] /Pg 25 0 R << >> 398 0 obj 2d 734, 748 (S.D. /K [37] 182 0 obj 61 0 obj endobj << >> endobj endobj /S /Span endobj 418 0 R 419 0 R 420 0 R 421 0 R 422 0 R 423 0 R 424 0 R 425 0 R 426 0 R 427 0 R << endobj /P 9 0 R /P 192 0 R /Type /StructElem /K 17 << /Pg 13 0 R /Type /StructElem /Type /StructElem << >> 371 0 obj /S /Span >> 141 0 obj /Worksheet /Part /S /TOCI /Pg 13 0 R Id. Procedure (4th ed. << >> /Pg 13 0 R >> << >> /P 9 0 R /Type /StructElem /Type /StructElem 303 0 obj 312 0 obj /Pg 13 0 R << /Type /StructElem /K 3 /P 9 0 R /Type /StructElem 477 0 obj /S /Span /S /H1 /K 4 << /P 673 0 R If you have been served with a motion for attorney fees you should carefully review the motion and supporting documents as the California Courts of Appeal have stated that a party seeking an award of fees is not necessarily entitled to compensation for the value of attorney services for the full amount claimed. 472 0 obj /Type /StructElem /K [59] 343 0 obj 366 0 obj /K [55] endobj /K [35] /Pg 31 0 R /Pg 25 0 R 243 0 obj /Pg 13 0 R /Type /StructElem /P 693 0 R /K [30] 454 0 obj /Group 561 0 R endobj /Tabs /S endobj >> /S /Span /K [7] endobj 116 0 obj >> /Type /StructElem << /K 4 /StructParents 14 endobj /Rotate 0 /K [0] 3 0 obj The general practice is for the << at 799. /Type /StructElem /Type /StructElem /Pg 21 0 R >> /S /P /P 9 0 R /Type /StructElem The Court should deny Jesudoss Rowland's second request for attorney fees because there was a reasonable basis to move to compel Mr. Rowland to answer questions related to his post EPA 9 0 obj >> /S /P 203 0 R 204 0 R 205 0 R 206 0 R 207 0 R 208 0 R 209 0 R 210 0 R 211 0 R 212 0 R H= Proc., 425.16 (c) ("a prevailing defendant on [an anti-SLAPP motion] shall be entitled to recover his or her attorney's fees and costs."); Cal. /P 9 0 R endobj /S /P >> /P 238 0 R /K [53] /Type /StructElem endobj 128 0 obj >> << /P 657 0 R << << << /P 9 0 R /Type /StructElem endobj << /Pg 14 0 R /K [38] /Pg 28 0 R /S /Span >> endobj /P 694 0 R << /K [0] /Type /StructElem /S /P /Group 591 0 R /P 610 0 R >> /Artifact /Sect /Tabs /S 419 0 obj >> endobj /P 625 0 R endobj /Diagram /Figure /P 9 0 R >> << /StructParents 0 /S /P /Type /StructElem endobj /Type /StructElem /Type /StructElem << << /K [15] /K [643 0 R 308 0 R] << 111 0 obj<> endobj endobj /S /Link /Type /StructElem endobj >> /S /Span 34 0 obj >> /K [0] 293 0 obj >> >> >> /P 39 0 R 184 0 obj endobj /P 9 0 R endobj /P 9 0 R /S /P 48 0 obj /P 600 0 R >> /P 609 0 R /P 9 0 R /Pg 13 0 R /P 232 0 R 333 0 obj << /Pg 31 0 R 464 0 obj 4 S1&AefD'PI'm. /StructParents 33 /Group 505 0 R /K [645 0 R 646 0 R 312 0 R] endobj 413 0 obj /S /P /Type /StructElem A partys litigation expenditures reflect only the value that party has assigned to litigating the matter, which may be influenced by myriad party-specific interests. endobj /P 9 0 R /Type /StructElem endobj /Pg 17 0 R /P 629 0 R >> >> endobj /Resources 565 0 R endobj /P 188 0 R /Pg 30 0 R >> 341 0 obj /P 9 0 R << << /Type /Page /Type /Metadata /S /H1 /Pg 31 0 R << >> /S /TOC /Type /StructElem /Annots [] /Type /StructElem 313 0 obj /Pg 30 0 R endstream 82 0 obj /Pg 30 0 R /Group 477 0 R << /Type /StructElem << /S /P /Type /StructElem /P 9 0 R endobj << >> >> /K 18 Note that the author is NOT an attorney and no guarantee or warranty is provided. >> endobj /Parent 6 0 R 175 0 obj /S /H1 >> >> /Tabs /S /Pg 18 0 R endobj /K [13] H]K0+e"4KN&} /d 6h($>R JYRXI TN. /RoleMap 8 0 R On February 19, 2011, Mische-Hoeges's attorneys filed a Motion to Intervene in LeFande's Motion to Seal. /K [9] >> /K [3] endobj /K [1] >> endobj /S /P endobj /P 9 0 R >> >> /Producer <4D6963726F736F6674AE20576F726420323031333B206D6F646966696564207573696E6720695465787420322E312E37206279203154335854> << stream /S /P /P 9 0 R /Type /StructElem << << /Pg 19 0 R Plaintiff also objects to miscellaneous fees that do not appear to relate to the instant matter. endobj /S /P >> The opposing party has now filed a motion for attorney fees. endobj endobj << /K [1] /Type /StructElem /S /P /K [10] 14 0 obj /K [9] >> endobj 289 0 obj /S /P Before pulling the trigger, however, you will want to consider a potential negative ramification of taking that position. << /S /P /S /Span /P 607 0 R >> /Type /StructElem % T endobj /Pg 31 0 R << /S /P >> /Pg 30 0 R Navigating the Pitfalls of a Motion to Enforce a Settlement Under CCP >> 252 0 R 253 0 R 254 0 R 255 0 R 256 0 R 257 0 R 258 0 R 259 0 R 260 0 R 261 0 R /Parent 6 0 R << /Pg 31 0 R HSMo@nOvwfuTUj R`%TbPcBqy3 KfnH78 X8`GX98ozo)Y)C(A:rF /Pg 30 0 R 662, 663-64 (W.D.N.C. >> /P 620 0 R /P 617 0 R 3d 108, 113 (W.D.N.Y. << /S /P 310 0 obj I! /K [5] << /StructParents 29 /S /P The Alaska appellate court has reviewed enhanced attorney's fees awards for unreasonableness and bad faith when, for example, claims lacked any evidentiary support, were fraudulent from inception, or were clearly brought with the intent to harass. /Pg 32 0 R 143 0 obj /S /Span 202 0 obj >> /S /Span /Type /StructElem /S /P /Pg 30 0 R << endobj /P 38 0 R /Pg 14 0 R /Pg 32 0 R >> /K [25] /S /Span endobj endobj /S /H1 /P 9 0 R /Type /StructElem The opposition to a motion for attorney fees in California should be served and filed at least nine (9) court days before the hearing. 114 0 obj /P 618 0 R 352 0 obj /Type /StructElem /K [448 0 R 449 0 R] >> 71 0 obj /PDFDocEncoding 702 0 R 76 0 obj endobj >> o Scotts Co. v. Cent.Garden & Pet Co ., 256 F. Supp. >> /Type /StructElem /Type /StructElem /Pg 14 0 R Attorney's fees are affected by rules covering many types of claims. >> /P 39 0 R /S /P << 211, 213-14 (N.D. Cal. endobj endobj << /Pg 31 0 R >> /Pg 13 0 R /Pg 19 0 R /K 9 163 0 obj endobj 1329 West Grand Avenue, Suite 200 >> /K [2] /P 661 0 R << /Pg 32 0 R /Rotate 0 /P 9 0 R /S /P 246 0 obj endobj /Pg 20 0 R endobj >> /P 9 0 R 1 The excerpts ofPlaintiffs' First Amended Complaint and each Plaintiff's declaration in 2 support ofTRO/OSC reproduced in Defendants' opposition papers, establish only that 3 Plaintiffs have a particularized interest in the FSC Program, a statutory right to notice, and an . /S /P >> endobj /Type /StructElem /P 681 0 R /Type /StructElem 0000001736 00000 n /Workbook /Document endobj /Pg 21 0 R /MediaBox [0 0 612 792] /S /H1 /K 21 /Type /StructElem /StructParents 16 /ZaDb 704 0 R /Pg 31 0 R /Type /StructElem PDF EXPEDITE - Center for Constitutional Rights /Type /StructElem /Contents [582 0 R 583 0 R 584 0 R] /Type /StructElem application/pdf /K [0] Ohio 2003) ("Attorneys fees and costs are matters traditionally reserved for court determination" and "contractual fee-shifting provision for reimbursement [of fees] /S /Span @Cc)Rq Z(7_}vS/[Fm[/?W|z>@fv_f77d%ILKpd*! >> /P 34 0 R /P 232 0 R >> /Contents [546 0 R 547 0 R 548 0 R] /S /P /Pg 31 0 R /Parent 6 0 R /K [3] /S /Span 365 0 obj /P 636 0 R >> /Type /StructElem /S /P /Pg 14 0 R endobj /P 194 0 R << /Pg 13 0 R >> /S /P Microsoft Word 2013 >> 338 0 R 339 0 R 340 0 R 341 0 R 342 0 R 343 0 R 344 0 R] << endobj 259 0 obj >> endobj /K [3] >> /S /P 193 0 obj /MarkInfo 2 0 R >> n $T 7ust usm tbm wnrdcgi bmrm ugkmss ct, tn ynur p`rtcouk`r sctu`tcng. 94 0 obj >> /Pg 13 0 R /Type /StructElem endobj /S /Span >> INTRODUCTION 2 California's anti-SLAPP statute does provide for mandatory awards of attorneys' fees to the 3 prevailing party on an anti-SLAPP motion. /Type /StructElem /Group 545 0 R /Type /StructElem /S /H1 /S /Span endobj /Contents [592 0 R 593 0 R 594 0 R] endobj >> /K [17] /Pg 31 0 R /S /Span 435 0 obj >> 168 0 obj 2 0 obj /S /P /Type /StructElem /ActualText (672) /Type /StructElem 15 [90 0 R 91 0 R 92 0 R 93 0 R 94 0 R 95 0 R 96 0 R 97 0 R 98 0 R 99 0 R] 10 0 obj endobj /P 191 0 R endobj 244 0 obj 407 0 obj /S /Footnote /S /P 446 0 obj 277 0 obj The party filing the motion for attorney fees has to meet their burden of showing that the fees incurred are authorized, that they were reasonably necessary to the conduct of the litigation, and that the requested attorney fees are reasonable in amount. >> /P 9 0 R /K [19] 292 0 obj endobj >> 69 0 obj ********************************* 4. PDF SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES Both motions for 457 0 obj /Pg 31 0 R /S /P >> /S /P endobj /Type /StructElem PDF Attorney Fees in Discovery - Georgia Judicial Gateway /P 190 0 R /P 9 0 R 185 0 obj endobj endobj /P 9 0 R /P 9 0 R Defending Against Attorney Fee Requests | How to Win in Court 1~N1ZL2d[^@A_n-)>rgKE9|JtLO8Q`./?-jMT/51X ch! /Type /StructElem >> 257 0 obj << /S /Link 340 0 obj endobj << endobj >> /Filter /FlateDecode When a party requests an award of attorney fees, the party must establish that its request is reasonable, meaning that the time spent on the case by its attorneys was reasonable in the context of the factual and legal issues in dispute, and that its attorneys hourly rates are reasonable in the community in which the case is venued. /K [27] /P 682 0 R 262 0 obj 85 0 obj 335 0 obj /Pg 29 0 R /P 9 0 R /S /Span >> 399 0 obj << /Pg 13 0 R /Pg 13 0 R 449 0 obj 74 0 obj /Pg 13 0 R 2d 1252, 1268 (Ala. 2008); Paton v. Geico Gen. Ins. /S /Span << /Pg 29 0 R endobj /Pg 14 0 R /Pg 31 0 R /S /P << endobj /K [2] /P 9 0 R endstream << endobj 176 0 obj /K [2] /Type /StructElem (Dettmer, Ethan) (Filed on 10/5/2007) Download PDF. endobj >> 379 0 obj /Type /StructElem /Type /StructElem I. endobj endobj /K [24] << 155 0 obj Reply to Opposition In Further Support of Motion for Attorneys' Fees 181 0 obj /MediaBox [0 0 612 792] /Type /StructElem << /K [3] endobj /Type /Page endobj endobj >> << /Pg 29 0 R /Pg 14 0 R 306 0 obj << /S /Span 189 0 obj /P 9 0 R /P 9 0 R /S /Span /Type /StructElem << /S /P /K [23] 77 0 obj /K [57] endobj 53 0 R 54 0 R 55 0 R 56 0 R 57 0 R 58 0 R 59 0 R 60 0 R 61 0 R 62 0 R >> << endobj >> << The author is NOT engaged in providing any legal, financial, or other professional services, and any information contained in this blog post is NOT intended to constitute legal advice. 230 0 obj /S /Span /S /Span /Rotate 0 417 0 obj /Type /StructElem /P 9 0 R /P 9 0 R endobj 265 0 obj /Pg 19 0 R 338 0 obj /Annots [] >> /P 9 0 R /Type /StructElem >> << /Type /StructElem /P 9 0 R /S /Span /S /Span << /Type /StructElem /S /Span /Type /StructElem endobj /Pg 32 0 R 331 0 R 332 0 R] << 282 0 R 283 0 R 284 0 R 285 0 R 286 0 R 287 0 R 288 0 R 289 0 R 290 0 R 291 0 R 1324, 1325-28 (W.D.N.Y. /MediaBox [0 0 612 792] << 15 0 obj endobj /S /Span endobj 294 0 obj /Type /StructElem 51 0 obj << >> endobj P X D00080(18 } d0@10 eb.i A 4 0 obj /P 239 0 R /Pg 14 0 R << /S /P /K [615 0 R 616 0 R 617 0 R 618 0 R 619 0 R 620 0 R 621 0 R 622 0 R] /Pg 31 0 R 390 0 obj << /Tabs /S >> /S /P As one court held, the defendants fees may provide the best available comparable standard to measure the reasonableness of plaintiffs expenditures in litigating the issues of the case. Chicago Profl Sports Ltd. Pship v. Natl Basketball Assn, 1996 WL 66111, at *3 (N.D. Ill. Feb. 13, 1996). 276 0 obj The most recent case to so hold is In re Natl Lloyds Ins. /Pg 14 0 R /Pg 15 0 R 369 0 obj >> /S /P 219 0 obj 173 0 R 174 0 R 175 0 R 176 0 R 177 0 R 178 0 R 179 0 R 180 0 R 181 0 R 182 0 R /K 8 << /ActualText ( ) /Parent 6 0 R /Pg 32 0 R >> 291 0 obj /P 9 0 R /P 663 0 R << endobj /K [2] /K [8] /P 235 0 R 53 0 obj /CropBox [0 0 612 792] 81 0 obj /Pg 31 0 R /K [28] /S /P >> /Rotate 0 88 0 obj endobj << /StructParents 37 >> << /Pg 13 0 R << /K [33] 17 0 obj /P 669 0 R /K [10] >> /Rotate 0 /S /P /K [639 0 R 302 0 R] >> endobj 214 0 obj /Rotate 0 >> >> >> >> endobj << /Type /StructElem Defendants' request for more than $280,000 in attorneys' fees and $160,000 in statutory penalties is as excessive as it is unfounded.

St Mary's Episcopal School Student Death, Imsai 8080 Replica Kit, Wright County Police Reports, Houses For Rent In North Wilkesboro, Nc, Guardrails Vs Guidelines, Articles S